RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
@mgernhardt @Frank2_2 @Matze49453608 @mansalke @Michael_Karalus @SHomburg Sie können vor dem Hintergrund ihrer Unkenntnis gerne die Beleidigungen weglassen. https://t.co/kJFQ0boMs1
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: What this means, is that ~ 50% of the population, with regional variations, is already largely immune from SARSCoV2 https…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: What this means, is that ~ 50% of the population, with regional variations, is already largely immune from SARSCoV2 https…
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @docsaxey: Important data.
Important data.
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
RT @robinmonotti: What this means, is that ~ 50% of the population, with regional variations, is already largely immune from SARSCoV2 https…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago: https://t.co/VfgleYLTin
DISCUSSION There is a critical need for foundational knowledge about T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2. Here, we report functional validation of predicted epitopes when arranged in epitope MPs, utilizing PBMCs derived from convalescing COVID-19 cases.
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
@Latudacris Listen to Dolores Cahill or some other immunologists out there about what’s really going on. Do you follow me on here? It’s all I talk about.. obsessive research.
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
Such good news.
RT @robinmonotti: What this means, is that ~ 50% of the population, with regional variations, is already largely immune from SARSCoV2 https…
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
What this means, is that ~ 50% of the population, with regional variations, is already largely immune from SARSCoV2 https://t.co/gGcuXaJfyI
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
To really understand what is going on we have to start with this tweet of 6 months ago:
https://t.co/cirQfUMalZ.. confirms again the known cross-reactivity immunity that exists in populations re colds & flus..T-cells are important part of herd immunity.. to prevent a new viral/mutation spread=lockdowns are worst for preventing this acquir
RT @AlexStarling77: @DewhirstRichard @get_involved1 @MikeWil15978120 @SepsisUK @OUHospitals @MichaelYeadon3 Quite. How about this one from…
@sarahsarah6777 @SepsisUK @OUHospitals The OUH report should be read in conjunction with the evidence on cross-immunity to other coronaviruses, e.g. May 2020 publication in Cell: https://t.co/dDv7v8Yt0d. Long Covid is a concern (like all illness!) but goes
@DewhirstRichard @get_involved1 @MikeWil15978120 @SepsisUK @OUHospitals @MichaelYeadon3 Quite. How about this one from May 2020? https://t.co/dDv7v8Yt0d: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40-60% of unexposed individuals, sugges
@MichaelYeadon3 https://t.co/pajJcPCRnD "In sum, the ability to measure and understand the human CD4+and CD8+T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection is a major knowledge gap" Hardly equivocal is it? But you only tweet what fits your narrative.
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: NEW study in CELL journal: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ~40-60% of unexposed individua…
RT @robinmonotti: The Daily Telegraph, today, 20th November, one of the first mainstream media outlets to cover what we were tweeting 6 MON…
RT @robinmonotti: The Daily Telegraph, today, 20th November, one of the first mainstream media outlets to cover what we were tweeting 6 MON…
RT @robinmonotti: The Daily Telegraph, today, 20th November, one of the first mainstream media outlets to cover what we were tweeting 6 MON…
RT @robinmonotti: The Daily Telegraph, today, 20th November, one of the first mainstream media outlets to cover what we were tweeting 6 MON…
The Daily Telegraph, today, 20th November, one of the first mainstream media outlets to cover what we were tweeting 6 MONTHS AGO! https://t.co/XTJrQEg9In
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
@francessmith @fact_covid @PHE_uk From May: "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40-60% of unexposed individuals, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘common cold’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2". https
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…