RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
RT @sdbaral: Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phe…
Does the fact that cellular immunity has now showed up in New York Times means that we can now accept this as a biological phenomenon? And by the way, why would the immune response to this coronavirus be so different from other coronaviruses? https://t.co
@danny_whufc @ConceptualJames https://t.co/kaYIasy9av (this is one of them...the real clue was the Diamond Princess data from Feb 2020 - couples sharing a small cabin did not get > 50% infectivity!)
@YardleyShooting What I would like to know is how many of those tested already had some form of prior immunity? @carlheneghan https://t.co/c6029cLvRt
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
@DrCKRobinson
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
Vaccine roll-out could take months. Until then, we should be working to establish who has T-cell immunity, whether from C19 itself or cross-reactively from other coronaviruses. Parts of UK may be very close to herd immunity; selective spread among low-risk
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: Join the dots: https://t.co/wuBQjpA2Al
@CTVNews Covid cases are far less than what RT-PCR positive throws up. There is a reason that "cases" are not resulting in deaths. Hospitals remain at historically under utilized levels. All cause mortality is low. Publish RT-PCR Ct https://t.co/GhhXnB
@picardonhealth @wencyleung @PatrickBrethour @globeandmail Covid cases are far less than what RT-PCR positive throws up. There is a reason that "cases" are not resulting in deaths. Hospitals remain at historically under utilized levels. All cause mortal
@allisonpearson Pre Exposure and Long Term immunity is real. The PM should get thix test done if his anti-bodies have disappeared. Just like medical staff cannot stop working on contact, PMs, especially recovered one's cannot stay in bunkers. https://t
Highly likely we already had herd immunity. May 2020: "We detected SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40%–60% of unexposed individuals, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating “common cold” coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2." https
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
Join the dots: https://t.co/wuBQjpA2Al
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
RT @robinmonotti: There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2…
There are two possible interpretations for this study: 1 There is cross reactive T-cell immunity between coronaviruses 2 SARSCoV2 is not "novel" or new
@Helenlaird @ToGreeks @toadmeister Epitope pools detect CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in 100% and 70% of convalescent COVID patients https://t.co/R8C0Xa919u
RT @robinmonotti: Roughly half the unexposed population already has a degree of immunity to Covid19. https://t.co/xCe8ND189w
RT @robinmonotti: Roughly half the unexposed population already has a degree of immunity to Covid19. https://t.co/xCe8ND189w
RT @ILOVETINY: @Bluemeanie72 @toadmeister T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 found in 40-60% of unexposed people. https://t.co/NCxGLPi9J1
@Bluemeanie72 @toadmeister T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 found in 40-60% of unexposed people. https://t.co/NCxGLPi9J1
RT @robinmonotti: Roughly half the unexposed population already has a degree of immunity to Covid19.
RT @robinmonotti: Roughly half the unexposed population already has a degree of immunity to Covid19.
RT @robinmonotti: Roughly half the unexposed population already has a degree of immunity to Covid19. https://t.co/xCe8ND189w
Roughly half the unexposed population already has a degree of immunity to Covid19.
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: 40-60% who carry SARSCoV2 for ~80+ days will not develop Covid19. This is why a PCR+ does NOT mean a Covid case. https://…
RT @hommel_b: https://t.co/dfjKG5BY6g Nog maar eens een studie over T-cel immuniteit tegen het SARS-CoV-2 virus. Gepubliceerd in Cell.…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals: 40-60% have some x-immunity... this explains partly the failed @imperialcollege #neilferguson predictions (SIR models) https://t.co/f5meolcF
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
👇
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
@Anna33562646 @pfmayer 1 Hi Anna Bei Siegel, even without an infection with this virus.... I had an influenza infection over ten years ago.... but now I have immunity to C-19! because C-19 is very similar to other influenza viruses! https://t.co/5LuzDt1KBy
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @ClareCraigPath: This is totally inline with the figures I wrote about yesterday and inline with data showing only half (max) of househo…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
Zóveelste bewijs dat de meesten van ons, meer dan de helft in het gunstigste geval, al immuniteit bezitten. #KuddeImmuniteit had allang bereikt kunnen worden als we niet opgesloten waren geweest. Helaas hebben we geen experts maar clowns aan het roer. ht
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
@robinmonotti If the PCR test above 35 ct detects a fragment of RNA for an asymptomatic case, then would it be plausible that a test would detect both the "Common Cold" & SARS-COV-2 c as the same positive result? https://t.co/NSVssrH6oi
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: 40-60% who carry SARSCoV2 for ~80+ days will not develop Covid19. This is why a PCR+ does NOT mean a Covid case.
No real surprise. Lets go for a 'moonshot' instead.🙄
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…
RT @robinmonotti: FACT: 40-60% of unexposed individuals have SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition…