The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical Efficiency of Vasopressin or Its Analogs in Comparison With Catecholamines Alone on Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2020.00563 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ren-qi Yao, De-meng Xia, Li-xue Wang, Guo-sheng Wu, Yi-bing Zhu, Hong-qiang Zhao, Qi Liu, Zhao-fan Xia, Chao Ren, Yong-ming Yao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Brazil | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,097,797
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,946
of 18,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,405
of 384,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#190
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.