The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Short-Term Effect of Different Taping Methods on Local Skin Temperature in Healthy Adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00488 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kun Liu, Zhouying Duan, Lihua Chen, Zixing Wen, Shengqun Zhu, Qiang Qu, Wenhua Chen, Shuxin Zhang, Bo Yu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,663,380
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,284
of 13,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,017
of 389,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#264
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.