↓ Skip to main content

レジオネラ肺炎の院内発症を契機とした病院給水系のレジオネラ属菌汚染の調査と除菌対策

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
レジオネラ肺炎の院内発症を契機とした病院給水系のレジオネラ属菌汚染の調査と除菌対策
Published in
Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control, March 2019
DOI 10.4058/jsei.33.193
Authors

中村 麻子, 島崎 信夫, 田中 梨恵, 飯田 秀夫

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control
#56
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,590
of 365,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.