The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The Potential Beneficial Effect of EPA and DHA Supplementation Managing Cytokine Storm in Coronavirus Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00752 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zoltán Szabó, Tamás Marosvölgyi, Éva Szabó, Péter Bai, Mária Figler, Zsófia Verzár |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 93% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 24% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,765,768
of 26,225,548 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#959
of 15,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,739
of 436,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#42
of 501 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,225,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 501 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.