The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Well Done! Effects of Positive Feedback on Perceived Self-Efficacy, Flow and Performance in a Mental Arithmetic Task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corinna Peifer, Pia Schönfeld, Gina Wolters, Fabienne Aust, Jürgen Margraf |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,402,385
of 26,601,484 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,945
of 35,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,242
of 438,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#88
of 746 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,601,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 746 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.