The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation strategies: implications for maternal and child health and nutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa171 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia Akseer, Goutham Kandru, Emily C Keats, Zulfiqar A Bhutta |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Belgium | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 31% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1477 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 167 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 138 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 115 | 8% |
| Researcher | 102 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 5% |
| Other | 228 | 15% |
| Unknown | 659 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 191 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 185 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 99 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 29 | 2% |
| Other | 227 | 15% |
| Unknown | 698 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,101,366
of 26,215,468 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2,093
of 12,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,102
of 486,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#32
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.