↓ Skip to main content

Retrospective Analysis of the Treatment Outcome in Myeloid Leukemia of Down Syndrome in Polish Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group From 2005 to 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retrospective Analysis of the Treatment Outcome in Myeloid Leukemia of Down Syndrome in Polish Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group From 2005 to 2019
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fped.2020.00277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malgorzata Czogala, Katarzyna Pawinska-Wasikowska, Teofila Ksiazek, Barbara Sikorska-Fic, Michal Matysiak, Jolanta Skalska-Sadowska, Jacek Wachowiak, Anna Rodziewicz-Konarska, Alicja Chybicka, Katarzyna Myszynska-Roslan, Maryna Krawczuk-Rybak, Dominik Grabowski, Jerzy Kowalczyk, Lucyna Maciejka-Kemblowska, Elzbieta Adamkiewicz-Drozynska, Katarzyna Bobeff, Wojciech Mlynarski, Renata Tomaszewska, Tomasz Szczepanski, Joanna Pohorecka, Agnieszka Chodala-Grzywacz, Grazyna Karolczyk, Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz, Katarzyna Mycko, Wanda Badowska, Karolina Zielezinska, Tomasz Urasinski, Magdalena Nykiel, Mariola Woszczyk, Malgorzata Ciebiera, Radosław Chaber, Szymon Skoczen, Walentyna Balwierz

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 16%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Unspecified 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,066,966
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,019
of 6,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,948
of 399,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#98
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.