The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Implementing Environmental Flows: Lessons for Policy and Practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00106 |
Authors |
David Tickner, Nitin Kaushal, Robert Speed, Rebecca Tharme |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Thailand | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,438,730
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#408
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,045
of 430,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#16
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.