The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Non-invasive Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Treatment for Covid19-Originated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00890 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eugenijus Kaniusas, Jozsef C. Szeles, Stefan Kampusch, Nuria Alfageme-Lopez, Daniela Yucuma-Conde, Xie Li, Julio Mayol, Christoph Neumayer, Michele Papa, Fivos Panetsos |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 18% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
El Salvador | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
Scientists | 3 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
Researcher | 15 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 60 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 23% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
Psychology | 8 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Engineering | 6 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 62 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#329,060
of 26,587,745 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#181
of 15,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,891
of 432,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#8
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.