The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Water Table Drawdown Alters Soil and Microbial Carbon Pool Size and Isotope Composition in Coastal Freshwater Forested Wetlands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00007 |
Authors |
Kevan J. Minick, Bhaskar Mitra, Xuefeng Li, Asko Noormets, John S. King |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,880
of 366,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them