The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional Electrical Stimulation Plus Visual Feedback Balance Training for Standing Balance Performance Among Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.00680 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David J. Houston, Jae W. Lee, Janelle Unger, Kei Masani, Kristin E. Musselman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 11 | 20% |
Engineering | 5 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,134,655
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,033
of 12,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,125
of 399,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#87
of 471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.