↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Cardiovascular Interval Training in Healthy Elderly Subjects: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Cardiovascular Interval Training in Healthy Elderly Subjects: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leandro de Oliveira Sant'Ana, Sérgio Machado, Aline Aparecida de Souza Ribeiro, Natália Rodrigues dos Reis, Yuri de Almeida Costa Campos, João Guilherme Vieira da Silva, Fabiana Rodrigues Scartoni, Amanda Fernandes Brown, Estêvão Rios Monteiro, Jefferson da Silva Novaes, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Henning Budde

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,278,529
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,481
of 13,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,515
of 398,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#163
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.