↓ Skip to main content

Tracking resource use relative to planetary boundaries in a steady-state framework: A case study of Canada and Spain

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking resource use relative to planetary boundaries in a steady-state framework: A case study of Canada and Spain
Published in
Ecological Indicators, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.034
Authors

Andrew L. Fanning, Daniel W. O'Neill

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 27%
Engineering 20 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 45 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,309,967
of 26,580,681 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#334
of 3,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,838
of 336,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#9
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,580,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.