The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Achievement of Substantial Reperfusion With Endovascular Thrombectomy Devices in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.524220 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chun-Jen Lin, Jeffrey L. Saver |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 50% |
Mexico | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Vietnam | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
Librarian | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,461,978
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,300
of 12,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,701
of 412,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#130
of 590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.