↓ Skip to main content

A Longitudinal Cohort Study Investigating Inadequate Preparation and Death and Dying in Nursing Students: Implications for the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
A Longitudinal Cohort Study Investigating Inadequate Preparation and Death and Dying in Nursing Students: Implications for the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02206
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Galvin, Gareth Richards, Andrew Paul Smith

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Lecturer 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Psychology 10 9%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,469,787
of 26,407,726 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,802
of 35,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,767
of 429,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#572
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,407,726 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.