You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Biogeochemical Cycling in Forest and Rangeland Soils of the United States
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 4 |
Book title |
Forest and Rangeland Soils of the United States Under Changing Conditions
|
Published by |
Springer, Cham, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-45216-2_4 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-045215-5, 978-3-03-045216-2
|
Authors |
Lindsey E. Rustad, Jennifer Knoepp, Daniel D. Richter, D. Andrew Scott, Rustad, Lindsey E., Knoepp, Jennifer, Richter, Daniel D., Scott, D. Andrew. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 20% |
Greece | 1 | 5% |
Portugal | 1 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
Scientists | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,444,302
of 23,715,461 outputs
Outputs from this source
#169
of 1,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,377
of 460,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#10
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,715,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.