↓ Skip to main content

Quantum Transport Enhancement by Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
13 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantum Transport Enhancement by Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep02361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoltán Zimborás, Mauro Faccin, Zoltán Kádár, James D. Whitfield, Ben P. Lanyon, Jacob Biamonte

Abstract

Quantum mechanics still provides new unexpected effects when considering the transport of energy and information. Models of continuous time quantum walks, which implicitly use time-reversal symmetric Hamiltonians, have been intensely used to investigate the effectiveness of transport. Here we show how breaking time-reversal symmetry of the unitary dynamics in this model can enable directional control, enhancement, and suppression of quantum transport. Examples ranging from exciton transport to complex networks are presented. This opens new prospects for more efficient methods to transport energy and information.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 43 68%
Materials Science 3 5%
Mathematics 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,875,917
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#17,131
of 122,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,130
of 197,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#81
of 547 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 547 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.