↓ Skip to main content

Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013206.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ratree Sawangjit, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul, Antonia Lloyd-Lavery, Nai Ming Lai, Robert Dellavalle, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 293 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Other 18 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 140 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 146 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,311,175
of 26,662,696 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,553
of 13,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,626
of 432,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,662,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.