The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Panel of Exosome-Derived miRNAs of Cerebrospinal Fluid for the Diagnosis of Moyamoya Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.548278 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gang Wang, Yunyu Wen, Oluwasijibomi Damola Faleti, Qingshun Zhao, Jingping Liu, Guozhong Zhang, Mingzhou Li, Songtao Qi, Wenfeng Feng, Xiaoming Lyu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
Researcher | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,552,974
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,745
of 11,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,658
of 434,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#232
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.