The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Muscle MEPs From Transcranial Magnetic and Electrical Stimulation and Appearance of Reflexes in Horses
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.570372 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sanne Lotte Journée, Henricus Louis Journée, Hanneke Irene Berends, Steven Michael Reed, Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn, Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 32% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,563,694
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,882
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,966
of 430,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#250
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.