↓ Skip to main content

Variants in CCL16 are associated with blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid CCL16 protein levels

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variants in CCL16 are associated with blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid CCL16 protein levels
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2788-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark T. W. Ebbert, Lyndsay A. Staley, Joshua Parker, Sheradyn Parker, Matthew Bailey, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Perry G. Ridge, Alison M. Goate, John S. K. Kauwe

Abstract

CCL16 is a chemokine predominantly expressed in the liver, but is also found in the blood and brain, and is known to play important roles in immune response and angiogenesis. Little is known about the gene's regulation. Here, we test for potential causal SNPs that affect CCL16 protein levels in both blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in a genome-wide association study across two datasets. We then use METAL to performed meta-analyses with a significance threshold of p < 5x10(-8). We removed SNPs where the direction of the effect was different between the two datasets. We identify 10 SNPs associated with increased CCL16 protein levels in both biological fluids. Our results will help understand CCL16's regulation, allowing researchers to better understand the gene's effects on human health.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Linguistics 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,784,098
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#986
of 10,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,349
of 352,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#31
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.