↓ Skip to main content

Mobilizing pharmacists to address the opioid crisis: A joint opinion of the ambulatory care and adult medicine practice and research networks of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy

Overview of attention for article published in JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 789)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobilizing pharmacists to address the opioid crisis: A joint opinion of the ambulatory care and adult medicine practice and research networks of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy
Published in
JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/jac5.1331
Authors

Scott A. Coon, Lucas G. Hill, Robert W. Hutchison, Lindsay M. Arnold, Jennie B. Jarrett, Anne R. Ottney, Alvin B. Oung, Nathan A. Painter, Michael A. Smith, Paul M. Stranges, Tran H. Tran, Amanda R. McFee Winans, Jeffrey P. Bratberg

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 21 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,483,472
of 26,439,667 outputs
Outputs from JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
#31
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,781
of 439,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,439,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.