The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Aggressive PDACs Show Hypomethylation of Repetitive Elements and the Execution of an Intrinsic IFN Program Linked to a Ductal Cell of Origin
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Discovery, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1202 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisa Espinet, Zuguang Gu, Charles D Imbusch, Nathalia A Giese, Magdalena Büscher, Mariam Safavi, Silke Weisenburger, Corinna Klein, Vanessa Vogel, Mattia Falcone, Jacob Insua-Rodríguez, Manuel Reitberger, Vera Thiel, Steffi O Kossi, Alexander Muckenhuber, Karnjit Sarai, Alex Y L Lee, Elyne Backx, Soheila Zarei, Matthias M Gaida, Manuel Rodríguez-Paredes, Elisa Donato, Hsi-Yu Yen, Roland Eils, Matthias Schlesner, Nicole Pfarr, Thilo Hackert, Christoph Plass, Benedikt Brors, Katja Steiger, Dieter Weichenhan, H Efsun Arda, Ilse Rooman, Janel L Kopp, Oliver Strobel, Wilko Weichert, Martin R Sprick, Andreas Trumpp |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 11% |
Germany | 10 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 79 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 52 | 48% |
Members of the public | 47 | 44% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 25% |
Researcher | 21 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 49 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#324,050
of 26,386,754 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#147
of 4,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,672
of 457,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#10
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,386,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.