↓ Skip to main content

Learning, Memory, and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning, Memory, and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joaquim P. Brasil-Neto

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been the subject of many studies concerning its possible cognitive effects. One of the proposed mechanisms of action for neuromodulatory techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and tDCS is induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD)-like phenomena. LTP and LTD are also among the most important neurobiological processes involved in memory and learning. This fact has led to an immediate interest in the study of possible effects of tDCS on memory consolidation, retrieval, or learning of various tasks. This review analyses published articles describing beneficial or disruptive effects of tDCS on memory and learning in normal subjects. The most likely mechanisms underlying these effects are discussed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 223 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 56 24%
Unknown 30 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 29%
Neuroscience 45 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 39 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,909,819
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,004
of 9,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,812
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#10
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.