The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inflammation and Skeletal Muscle Wasting During Cachexia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.597675 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Justine M. Webster, Laura J. A. P. Kempen, Rowan S. Hardy, Ramon C. J. Langen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
Scientists | 6 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 228 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
Researcher | 18 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
Other | 36 | 16% |
Unknown | 88 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 11% |
Unknown | 98 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,760,559
of 26,621,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#964
of 15,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,328
of 532,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#26
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,621,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.