The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
FDG-PET/CT Incidental Detection of Cancer in Patients Investigated for Infective Endocarditis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00535 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frédérique Gouriet, Hervé Tissot-Dupont, Jean-Paul Casalta, Sandrine Hubert, Serge Cammilleri, Alberto Riberi, Hubert Lepidi, Gilbert Habib, Didier Raoult |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,669,700
of 24,994,150 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,553
of 6,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,284
of 407,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#114
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,994,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.