↓ Skip to main content

The Dresden Protocol for Multidimensional Walking Assessment (DMWA) in Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dresden Protocol for Multidimensional Walking Assessment (DMWA) in Clinical Practice
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.582046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrin Trentzsch, Marie Luise Weidemann, Charlotte Torp, Hernan Inojosa, Maria Scholz, Rocco Haase, Dirk Schriefer, Katja Akgün, Tjalf Ziemssen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Engineering 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,282,712
of 26,744,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,286
of 12,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,538
of 446,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#81
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,744,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.