The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Quantitative Evaluation of a New Posturo-Locomotor Phenotype in a Rodent Model of Acute Unilateral Vestibulopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.614242 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guillaume Rastoldo, Emna Marouane, Nada El Mahmoudi, David Péricat, Audrey Bourdet, Elise Timon-David, Olivier Dumas, Christian Chabbert, Brahim Tighilet |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,278,872
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,503
of 12,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,626
of 420,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#441
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.