The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Psychological Effects of the Allocation Process in Human–Robot Interaction – A Model for Research on ad hoc Task Allocation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564672 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alina Tausch, Annette Kluge, Lars Adolph |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 8 | 19% |
Engineering | 6 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,551,787
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,384
of 34,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,121
of 429,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#400
of 802 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 802 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.