The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dexmedetomidine – Commonly Used in Functional Imaging Studies – Increases Susceptibility to Seizures in Rats But Not in Wild Type Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00832 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aleksandra Bortel, Roland Pilgram, Ze Shan Yao, Amir Shmuel |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 8 | 42% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,673
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,394
of 440,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#311
of 358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.