The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toward Closing a Loophole: Recovering Rare Earth Elements from Uranium Metallurgical Process Tailings
|
---|---|
Published in |
JOM, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11837-020-04451-7 |
Authors |
James Vaughan, Kate Tungpalan, Anita Parbhakar-Fox, Weng Fu, Emma J. Gagen, Philip Nti Nkrumah, Gordon Southam, Antony van der Ent, Peter D. Erskine, Paul Gow, Rick Valenta |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 25% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 11% |
Engineering | 6 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 9% |
Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,751,636
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#291
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,510
of 381,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.