The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of Adherence-Enhancing Interventions for Immunosuppressive Therapy in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2020.578887 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yue-Xian Shi, Chun-Xia Liu, Fei Liu, Hai-Ming Zhang, Ming-Ming Yu, Yin-Hui Jin, Shao-Mei Shang, Ying-Xin Fu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Librarian | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,771,452
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,557
of 16,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,654
of 419,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#230
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.