↓ Skip to main content

Mental Well-Being During Pandemic: The Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies in Risk Perception and Affective Response to COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mental Well-Being During Pandemic: The Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies in Risk Perception and Affective Response to COVID-19
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.589973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Schudy, Karolina Żurek, Marcelina Wiśniewska, Aleksandra Piejka, Łukasz Gawȩda, Łukasz Okruszek

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 45 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 17%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 44 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,836,571
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7,166
of 10,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,145
of 421,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#346
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.