@Eddie200173 @YesimCandan Het bewijs, recent, wetenschappelijk (die term wordt vaak misbruikt, maar dit is echt gedegen onderzoek, peer reviewed) uit Duitsland: echt lezen!! https://t.co/Id2jiJgjpq
RT @jamrock78: @jdportes @whippletom German study with far better controls came to different conclusion, but it won’t fit Peters narrative.…
South Carolina: https://t.co/AbiZIyt5b5 Kansas: https://t.co/aqGz5ECPFm https://t.co/n3ufNqTXyc Tennessee: https://t.co/Isg1sV8lNl South Dakota Cities... https://t.co/cDl3qex8Sv Germany: https://t.co/P3TiWMbPEY
RT @fdabl: If there is one thing I envy economists for it is their knack for exploiting (quasi)natural experiments to do causal inference.…
@maestro_rayo @AlfOnshuus (evidencia es débil) Eso Maestro, no es verdad 1. https://t.co/gyFxPFUlyE 2. Gran Escala https://t.co/WP9PVaYSOg 3. Pequeña Escala https://t.co/CUcVISjtZX 4. https://t.co/3rKG6MsU4c 5. Entonces los médicos no deberían usar t
RT @fdabl: If there is one thing I envy economists for it is their knack for exploiting (quasi)natural experiments to do causal inference.…
If there is one thing I envy economists for it is their knack for exploiting (quasi)natural experiments to do causal inference. This paper on face masks that got published last month is a good example: https://t.co/FJ8iKjke1c
@Idonotconsent6 @Russell03544634 @lewis_goodall @DrDarrenConway No but it is that simple, you know... logic. Here’s a study for you though, far more comprehensive than the danish one. https://t.co/zhE9OE399n
@RobertBeatty1 @Russell94627540 @JoeBiden @LoniLove False. "As economic costs are close to zero compared to other public health measures, masks seem to be a cost-effective means to combat COVID-19." https://t.co/6Rl0fGLsMk
@RobertBeatty1 @TellThe95458317 @Russell94627540 @LoniLove False. "Assessing the credibility of the various estimates, we conclude that face masks reduce the daily growth rate of reported infections by around 47%." https://t.co/6Rl0fGLsMk
@HarperL75661966 @MichaelYeadon3 Oh, I have looked at the evidence Harper, I suggest you do, they don’t simply not work because of some crank conspiracy theory you follow https://t.co/5izAkyrPuu
@michaseu @thewibblemovem1 @geenlid @MichaelYeadon3 As I’ve just posted this on another post I’ll post it for you, the other ones are on my posts to the Fat Emperor https://t.co/5izAkyrPuu
@geenlid @MichaelYeadon3 I know what RCT is thanks, however, RCTs are not the only valid scientific methodology - as I’m sure you’re aware! https://t.co/5izAkyrPuu
@Matthew900118 @BreezerGalway @MrQuantity @JimTimberthing @gp1980cos Phew! It was going so well for you too! https://t.co/5Dp56ntZEG
@MrQuantity @TakethatCt @Matthew900118 @JimTimberthing @gp1980cos What do yo not understand about 'it was about the wearer'? https://t.co/vx1kP0T7N7.)
Some health authorities recommend that masks be worn by ill individuals to prevent onward transmission (source control)4,8. So basically the ones who are ill should wear it. Not healthy people.
@georgevanhouts Werken wel degelijk George, hier een recent onderzoek uit Duitsland: https://t.co/Id2jiJgjpq
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: マスク着用の効果がドイツから。マスク着用が義務化された地域とそうでない地域で、その後の新型コロナ感染者数の増加を比較。マスク義務化から20日後に、新規感染が約45%減少したと結論。費用は他の公衆衛生的介入と比較しほぼゼロのため、マスクは費用…
RT @ellethejambo: @JuliaHB1 It's an airborne virus Julia. Don't like it, don't go outside 💁🏼♀️https://t.co/1ak71xOzrn
add in gloves, folks. WHAT? Do not troll me, please. change your gloves daily outside pumping gas? Use gloves out in public? Use gloves or use hand cleaner. the covid can live on surfaces/ particles are suspended in the dry air/ try inhouse humidity?
"Weighing various estimates, we conclude that 20 d after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%." Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany https://t.co/WyWQ3Fuyez
@leannemac4 @tuffy_sir 😂😂😂 I was hoping you were going to say that, enjoy the read https://t.co/eQ0q2Groji
@sandcastle1975 @MrsSarahMurray @Shanal48663109 @JuliaHB1 @Wallid74 Mask wearing seems to be a minimal step https://t.co/5Dp56ntZEG
@Nitram055 @ChielKloppenbu1 @fvdemocratie @thierrybaudet @op1npo @WybrenvanHaga Met een heel klein beetje basis kennis van virussen, hoe ze werken en verspreiden, kun je al begrijpen dat lockdowns en maskers werken. Van Haga beweert nog altijd, ondanks vee
@leonore_sacha @Crosshead16 @veit_markus @stephmanlgb @Markus_Soeder Das war von mir ironisch gemeint. Ich befürworte die Pflicht eine Maske zu tragen. Dazu gibt es mittlerweile auch Studien. @veit_markus Was sagen sie denn dazu? https://t.co/iK880VYyLh Un
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: マスク着用の効果がドイツから。マスク着用が義務化された地域とそうでない地域で、その後の新型コロナ感染者数の増加を比較。マスク義務化から20日後に、新規感染が約45%減少したと結論。費用は他の公衆衛生的介入と比較しほぼゼロのため、マスクは費用…
@MichaelYeadon3 No there isn't, in fact the opposite can be said https://t.co/3uZWRtIJvx
@HZLABZ I Ty kom de fram till att munskydd minskar smittspridningen med 45% UTÖVER den effekten avstånd redan hade. Du menar alltså att denhär peer-reviewed studien är fel och ngn snubbe som suttit och hittat på utan peer-review har rätt? https://t.co/waIi
@DavidTa69192197 @ClarkeMicah Rubbish. Oh, and they are there to protect others, not the wearer 🤦🏽♂️ https://t.co/avg5uHDGqB
@AgnesWold @hanifbali Må så vara, men det finns ju evidens för att det minskar smittspridning av corona, t.ex här: https://t.co/jvJ2wP26IR. Även om evidensen inte är den starkast möjliga så är den tillräckligt stark för att motivera maskbärande. Finns mig
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: マスク着用の効果がドイツから。マスク着用が義務化された地域とそうでない地域で、その後の新型コロナ感染者数の増加を比較。マスク義務化から20日後に、新規感染が約45%減少したと結論。費用は他の公衆衛生的介入と比較しほぼゼロのため、マスクは費用…
@Freedom_2020_21 @ken_beckfoot1 @PaulEmbery Every study?? 🤔 that said I don’t think masks are necessary outdoors. https://t.co/5jUpeKZfLg
@magicOclock @healthgovau How about you go and read some literature first? Mask will reduce infection rate by 40%, and if you enjoy fresh air you can stay outdoors, https://t.co/8k0V2EexmQ
@KlausAndersen9 @SrenKVillemoes Velbekomme. https://t.co/awIInZtrMY
@AndersSkovrup @Revsgaard @SrenKVillemoes Omfattende studie i Tyskland: Weighing various estimates, we conclude that 20 d after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45% https://t.co/v8CBczAUcF
@Palermo_And @KlausAndersen9 @SrenKVillemoes Nok lidt mere end det: Weighing various estimates, we conclude that 20 d after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45% https://t.co/v8CBczAUcF
@Lauren_Southern Oh you mean like these experts? https://t.co/yMHwcvvsGW
@ShaunTaylorDC @tradeswithpanda @BNODesk Masks help, not 100% prevention but about half. One study here. Please stop spreading false information.
@JamesRo38094606 @ChisieWeirdo @chrisle91827360 @toadmeister No they are not . Masks work and so do lockdowns https://t.co/v6K4Bk2Vrh
@WWakeUpTime @NeilDotObrien @toadmeister You haven't provided anything beyond a vapid claim. You also failed to debunk this https://t.co/5Dp56ntZEG
@CoronaStasi @keryn_1 @buntyheelsdown @simondolan East Asia ! Always wear masks . Nobody died or was sick wearing one . https://t.co/v6K4Bk2Vrh
RT @ConquerCovid_19: A study confirms the importance of #WearAMask. 20 d after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the # of new inf…
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: マスク着用の効果がドイツから。マスク着用が義務化された地域とそうでない地域で、その後の新型コロナ感染者数の増加を比較。マスク義務化から20日後に、新規感染が約45%減少したと結論。費用は他の公衆衛生的介入と比較しほぼゼロのため、マスクは費用…
RT @spasskultur: die "studie" zu masken in jena ist btw. eine reine modellrechnung anhand einer fiktiven vergleichsstadt. die tatsächlich…
die "studie" zu masken in jena ist btw. eine reine modellrechnung anhand einer fiktiven vergleichsstadt. die tatsächliche wirkung von masken in jena: https://t.co/jYFRCNHZPW
coronatroll https://t.co/EL73ikfdgT
RT @MaxCRoser: A new PNAS study on the impact of face masks on the spread of COVID-19 in Germany. “We conclude that 20 days after becomin…
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: マスク着用の効果がドイツから。マスク着用が義務化された地域とそうでない地域で、その後の新型コロナ感染者数の増加を比較。マスク義務化から20日後に、新規感染が約45%減少したと結論。費用は他の公衆衛生的介入と比較しほぼゼロのため、マスクは費用…
@Eerjohn3 @IreneHoogenraad Het bewijs, uit Duitsland, waar de omstandigheden ideaal waren voor onderzoek, omdat het in verschillende deelstaten op verschillende momenten ingevoerd werd: https://t.co/Id2jiJgjpq
@KKlorofyll @GoteborgsPosten "Weighing various estimates, we conclude that 20 d after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%." https://t.co/VFcqHf6L7W Nästan halverad smittspridning med obligatoriska masker. L
@TimmmmBates @FF_Drafters @warriorpoet91 @ClayTravis There quite literally is evidence: https://t.co/2qN6h8Tnz0 https://t.co/y4Gz5HDYgu https://t.co/4uiKQ8Lunv Should be some good reading material for someone who claims to look at the data
RT @SteffenHelledie: @AndyPlum15 @ianmSC @JordanSchachtel https://t.co/0lXrFhoTrT masks seems to reduce the number of new infections by aro…
@___nfrossi Da uma olhada nesse link https://t.co/7VLgCc3dyh
RT @HonestDrJohn: @ClarkeMicah I've pestered you for weeks with this: https://t.co/kjl3XBVWjL but you keep quoting the inferior Danish st…
@SarrasinLucide @matthieugarby @docprimum @Stalec_ @Kawa_khan @MrSam144 @Acermendax @AstronoGeek @QuackFighter Les études qui montrent l'efficacité du confinement https://t.co/CeK9nRZjwQ et des masques : https://t.co/VbxxKK3BTe
@teamivor @KincaidMrs @DWUhlfelderLaw I've got plenty of scientific studies, here's another. "We conclude that 20 d after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%." https://t.co/K4i0ff3CZg
RT @HonestDrJohn: @ClarkeMicah I've pestered you for weeks with this: https://t.co/kjl3XBVWjL but you keep quoting the inferior Danish st…
@ClarkeMicah I've pestered you for weeks with this: https://t.co/kjl3XBVWjL but you keep quoting the inferior Danish study.
Will @ClarkeMicah threaten to sue if say he's a liar? OK, I won't. He's ignorant. This paper has been brought to his confirmation biased attention more than once: https://t.co/kjl3XBVWjL PS the Danish study didn't "show masks were useless at preventing inf
RT @MaxCRoser: A new PNAS study on the impact of face masks on the spread of COVID-19 in Germany. “We conclude that 20 days after becomin…
@surukundun @alejobongio @Gus_Noriega No es gansada el tapaboca. Dejen de repetir idioteces. Por gente que no usa o la usa mal (debajo de la nariz, suelta o en la pera) estamos como estamos... https://t.co/I3p8btSd7v https://t.co/IeAFs8e4JN
@Michael_Liddle9 @samthesparrow You utter muppet 🤦🏽♂️ https://t.co/IRenMx4d8c.
@EmilBergholtz Det är ju testat ute i verkligheten: https://t.co/YHR4j28qDc
@MikeGilliam84 @kikkenmh3 @TheBigJamesG @tedcruz Clearly, you're not listening to the healthcare professionals or you would be supporting mask use. https://t.co/z3wEM0W1IN
@TheBigJamesG @kikkenmh3 @tedcruz I'm not sure why you don't understand that different viruses are differently infectious. That's not new to covid. That's basic knowledge about disease. Now, to the heart of your post: https://t.co/z3wEM0W1IN
@jdecentralized @misterskipper @RussellFosterTX @tedcruz Do masks work against covid? Yes. Please put in at least minimal effort. N95 meta analysis: https://t.co/8AbKtsszE8 home-made cloth masks: https://t.co/FNZRMWe3bl population based case study:
@racechikee @paulmasonnews Or how about this analysis of Germany's infections where they had regional rollouts so differences were able to be seen, documented, and understood? https://t.co/OQidxsgRxx
@BaldingsWorld I think we have good econometric studies now that suggest mask mandates reduce transmission by like 20-45% (here are some select papers), but the relative effectiveness of other NPIs is def uncertain. https://t.co/LZE6wdrzrH https://t.co/k
RT @LGM_FO_UNAM: Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany | PNAS https://t.co/rTj2A44TvB
@mp3michael Masks were shown to reduce infections by 47% in Germany, so the question is how bad would Denmark be if they had not mandated masks? https://t.co/Gjf7OvnAI9
@SailAwayOnBlue @MichaelYeadon3 @kr3at @WHOWPRO what about an epidemiologist? https://t.co/tYc5lz7yJj
@SChipwick @ianmSC @JordanSchachtel https://t.co/0lXrFhoTrT masks seems to reduce the number of new infections by around 45% - it really would have been worse
@ScottsOriole @ianmSC @JordanSchachtel https://t.co/0lXrFhoTrT masks seems to reduce the number of new infections by around 45% - it really would have been worse yes
@AndyPlum15 @ianmSC @JordanSchachtel https://t.co/0lXrFhoTrT masks seems to reduce the number of new infections by around 45% - it really works
@Xrpinvestor2 @DoctorKarl PNAS is a US peer reviewed journal: https://t.co/HVcUZwYpuQ There's also a recent pubmed article posted: https://t.co/rXh427taCr
Used a model to compare mask vs no mask population
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: マスク着用の効果がドイツから。マスク着用が義務化された地域とそうでない地域で、その後の新型コロナ感染者数の増加を比較。マスク義務化から20日後に、新規感染が約45%減少したと結論。費用は他の公衆衛生的介入と比較しほぼゼロのため、マスクは費用…
RT @SteveStuWill: "We conclude that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%. As…
RT @SteveStuWill: "We conclude that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%. As…
RT @SteveStuWill: "We conclude that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%. As…
@mccalla_chris @Spoonhead8 @Vixxylixxy @ed_itu @JassyMine69 Oh, and this of course: https://t.co/Nx779bxHuE
@minnaarve @PaakkinenReeta Ja maskeiksi ei riitä kankainen, vaan pitää olla oikeasti viruskokoisia partikkeleja supdattava, liten FFP2/KN95 tai edes kirurginen BFE98 https://t.co/PgTnV6xPj8
RT @SteveStuWill: "We conclude that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%. As…
RT @SteveStuWill: "We conclude that 20 days after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%. As…