The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Resilient and rapid recovery of native trout after removal of a non‐native trout
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Science and Practice, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1111/csp2.325 |
Authors |
Phaedra E. Budy, Timothy Walsworth, Gary P. Thiede, Paul D. Thompson, Matthew D. McKell, Paul B. Holden, Paul D. Chase, W. Carl Saunders |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
India | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,432,899
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#583
of 1,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,427
of 518,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#36
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.