@Index_Wookiee @k_b_lvi @adiosmuchachos4 Vaccines take days to develop. It's funding and trialling and finding volunteers which consume time. This was debunked 3 years ago... https://t.co/d0avoIu3Ct
RT @kingradeon: コロナワクチンの効果を示した論文の多くは、接種後一定期間の感染者を感染者から除外している。 常識的だと思っていたが、医クラはほとんど知らないようだ。 事実を突きつけられてこの医クラは小学生のような反応しかできなくなっている。 医クラが如何に、…
RT @kingradeon: コロナワクチンの効果を示した論文の多くは、接種後一定期間の感染者を感染者から除外している。 常識的だと思っていたが、医クラはほとんど知らないようだ。 事実を突きつけられてこの医クラは小学生のような反応しかできなくなっている。 医クラが如何に、…
コロナワクチンの効果を示した論文の多くは、接種後一定期間の感染者を感染者から除外している。 常識的だと思っていたが、医クラはほとんど知らないようだ。 事実を突きつけられてこの医クラは小学生のような反応しかできなくなっている。 医クラが如何に、非科学的な人達かを証明する出来事。
@finalchad @crudsworth @vancemurphy If you actually want to learn something - start here with just the first two trials of >75,000 people. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@NodokaVer @Roy1358 いくら待っても自分で論文出せません。 2回目投与の翌日から7日後まで感染すると対象外w > 2回目の投与から7日後までSARS-CoV-2感染の血清学的またはウイルス学的証拠がなかった参加者の2回目の投与の発症から少なくとも7日後に確認されたCovid-19に対するBNT162b2の有効性 https://t.co/rWLtZNo7Xy
@TeamPortia @Robber_Baron_ @DrJBhattacharya Are you really this retarded? Are 75,000 participants "too small" for just the first two randomized trials alone? Do you think they actually "faked" these? https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@NephilimGallery @Robber_Baron_ To conclude - you actually believe that these first two trials were "faked"? https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@NephilimGallery @Robber_Baron_ These are the first two phase III trials published in the New England Journal. They were completed before the vaccine was released - which is how we do things here. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@farkoi @lonnibesancon alors que c'est marqué dans les essais cliniques de 2020? Mais vous êtes désespérants de conneries les antivax https://t.co/VX4ubxkDgb
@kbo1978 @iNSiG9FiX @SSI_dk Jeg kan hjælpe dig lidt på vej. https://t.co/Rw1hajMtGT
@Mik223109 治験時点で『接種して感染した人』も『接種しなくても感染しなかった人』も居るだけ。 https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR https://t.co/jY943RlNMW
@Marcoberliner @Olivierfente @lemondefr https://t.co/xDJLIHYHxu Fig. 3, 1 personne dans le grp des vaccinés a fait une forme grave de la maladie (représenté par un carré); page 11, https://t.co/SeEkPvpv2e une personne dans le grp des vaccinés est décédée d
@christine62773 @Olivierfente Les tests permettant de s'assurer si les vaccins étaient sûr et éfficaces étaient bien évidemment terminés, comme le demande la procédure d'AMM https://t.co/e0mHZ3zQ6g Vous confondez avec la phase de pharmacovigilence qui vis
@markerdragon2 @GarretKramer What? That’s 500,000 pages of documentation from the Pfizer trial. Here’s the peer reviewed data. https://t.co/FJJJaMMTru You aren’t sounding so open minded now, are you? You’re not interested in the science. You reject it all
@realRobPlumber @LBower32390965 Yup. Clinical timeframe for longterm for vaccines is 12 weeks. There’s no interaction with spike protein and cancer cells in humans. That wouldn’t even be a concern https://t.co/bt8aPLimyE
@hiro12034 @oyukihan1126 ポっと出でもないし、安全性未確認でもないし、数万人規模での治験やって安全確認もしているのに、君のモヤのかかった脳みそでは理解できないか。 根拠ないでしか知識を埋められないんだね。 https://t.co/RoXFQIkWBa
@Bertheltwo @etatsdechoc_ @ZytoCher Naaaaaaaannnnnnnn sans déconner ??????? Say vrai ça ???????????? Incroyableuh!!!!!! Inouiiiiii Sinon tu lisais l'essais clinique de 2020 et c'était marqué dedans 😂 J'ai comme l'impression que c'est toi qui t'es fait ber
@License2Breathe Yes. Clinical recognition of longterm for a vaccine is 12 weeks. https://t.co/bt8aPLimyE
@etelorrain @Esban_ @ByteOctet @admilfer Elle n'existe pas. On a tout depuis le début. Là, par exemple, suivi de cohorte 31 décembre 2020 : https://t.co/qg7lFosMmf
@TruthHurts2160 @Pickles_Malone @PavlosPavlova @derowzey Zzzzzz https://t.co/PteJcqhXuO My grans porridge has less density. And is infinitely more interesting.
@MarcAntoineSai5 @jenyhart2 @ByteOctet @EugenieBastie @ThomasHuchon @ThierryMARIANI @BonPote Je n'ai participé à rien du tout. Les tests ont été réalisés durant l'année 2020, et je n'ai été vacciné qu'en mai 2021. La publication des résultats des tests du
@RozmowyzBogiem @AgnieszkaSzust3 Oczywiście, że miała, nie ma dopuszczenia leku do obrotu bez raportu z badań klinicznych tu np. badanie dot. szczepionki Pfizer https://t.co/VFJValicZ9
@Lord_Talbot64 @mpc_xetts @antonis_tsagari @charlespinion @yeahnaa333 I showed you the like for like cohorts from the clinical trials https://t.co/1iQAYGt474
@HAGENOKINBA 勉強不足の詐欺師は、お前だよ。 お前は怠惰で無知だから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc https://t.co/mSqCA7NpnL
@re_artu1300 @PoulardMere @IlNazionale @Clutcher @RastaRegola @ElLoboNegron16 https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB 42.000 per il Pfizer e 30.000 per il Moderna, boccalone e ignorante. https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB
@AdamBilodeau1 @TheDrJon Here you go: the phase 3 trial results. https://t.co/y1JFdUdNJp
@BryanLand111980 @unquacked88499 @FactsAreGood @Strongdoctah @Alchemywizzard You were sayin? 😏 Checkmate https://t.co/bt8aPLimyE
@LA45678 @NielsendoBrasil Estudo da Pfizer de fase 3, duplo-cego randomizado controlado por placebo: https://t.co/vfuIMH2Q3l
@Julia29 @FactsAreGood @InformedNJNurse @230NBroad @BarryYoungNZ @SenRonJohnson @ABridgen @MRobertsQLD @tom35345637 @RenzTom @DowdEdward All clinical trials study safety. Your statement that there are no studies on the safety of vaccines is false. I agre
@TruthHurts2160 @Handenhalla @TheCIVICSc @NoMaloneZone Results of the trial were published in December 2020 https://t.co/hI8s67X9j2
@ogilville1 @evans_luca15479 @Hypothesis @Squwerlz Peer-reviewed... Have a read, you might learn something. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@ogilville1 @evans_luca15479 @Hypothesis @Squwerlz They? Who they? https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@ball_hartwig @polenz_r Die Frage ist doch, wieso Du lügst. Ist es Unwissen, Dummheit oder gewollte Demagogie? Bist Du ein Russentroll, also der Abschaum der Menschheit? Der Link zur Studie. Hocheffektiv. https://t.co/96QAUP1WVU https://t.co/Irpn4VIVWi
@binomeu @MMeBlackSheep Voici un extrait de l'appendice de l'étude qui a servi à l'AMM du vaccin cominarty pfizer (document disp en bas de l'étude https://t.co/i65YIs6KwQ) Ca indique 2 décès sur la période de l'étude au sein du groupe test et 4 au sein du
@La_Mooid @donnadmk @Jonty_W @AlastairMcA30 Read the first two trials alone. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@TheKnoll67 @TimTrippDesign @MedRest1 @morphnz68 @nzdsos Here are the results published December 2020 of the phase 3 clinical trials. The results can be found under the title "Results". Saying the results are deferred to 2025 is a lie. https://t.co/mIdi
@La_Mooid @donnadmk @Jonty_W @AlastairMcA30 I read actual scientific journals - not someone's highlighter. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@KintuCCM @doug_nancy @DrSeussBen @DrSuneelDhand Sorry, it was 162 in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group. The trial has been repeated in older adults, middle-aged adults, young adults, children... https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu
@chick_grits @KLVeritas It did, skippy. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@MalekaSade @vlb55jr @USBornNRaised All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vac
@cookespring @USBornNRaised All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated
@Really85301035 @USBornNRaised All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinat
@SportsDataUS @USBornNRaised All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated
Well, this is just another lie, isn't it? What is todays date? https://t.co/pYYiSIqwLZ
@vlb55jr @USBornNRaised All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated cont
@PourlAmourdeDi2 @TroncheBiais Super. Elle ne dit rien de plus que ce qui est écrit dans l'étude parue fin 2020. 😉 https://t.co/2g39QbIJv0 Donc le fait que des neuneus sortent ça fin 2022 comme si c'était un scoop (ces mêmes neuneus se prétendant spécialis
@d_d_5_6 @L2Z44 @skepticalraptor Of course I get blocked. They don’t want facts. https://t.co/gTN4BQSCCS
RT @marybethpf: Remember when @NEJM said that Pfizer vax “BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19.” Time to rethink all we were t…
RT @USBornNRaised: Never spew bullshit because someone has facts you are not aware of. 2025 https://t.co/T6emInWKpZ
@BobKnezevic Which part do you believe they skipped there? Let's start with the 43,548 participants and go from there. Here, this is something I doubt you read before making any of your comments, so let's catch you up shall we. https://t.co/Tgeu7tbdqv
RT @USBornNRaised: Never spew bullshit because someone has facts you are not aware of. 2025 https://t.co/T6emInWKpZ
RT @USBornNRaised: Never spew bullshit because someone has facts you are not aware of. 2025 https://t.co/T6emInWKpZ
RT @USBornNRaised: Never spew bullshit because someone has facts you are not aware of. 2025 https://t.co/T6emInWKpZ
RT @USBornNRaised: Never spew bullshit because someone has facts you are not aware of. 2025 https://t.co/T6emInWKpZ
RT @marybethpf: Remember when @NEJM said that Pfizer vax “BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19.” Time to rethink all we were t…
Never spew bullshit because someone has facts you are not aware of. 2025 https://t.co/T6emInWKpZ
@USBornNRaised All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, goo
@USBornNRaised All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, goo
@DomCorner3 @ChatSecouriste @PhilippeLu34673 @decoder_l Pas expérimental puisqu'on a les résultats de phase 3 publiés en décembre 2020, ça rentre dans ton crâne ou toujours pas ? https://t.co/889RJZHLw0
@JaredPallesen @coreisma @AntiMandateMan @nzfirst Pfizer's original Dec2021 RCT shows more vaxxed people died than unvaxxed, but also that it had only a minuscule theoretical benefit (0.84% ARR). https://t.co/AhQuiNXnEY There is MUCH more that shows the
RT @marybethpf: Remember when @NEJM said that Pfizer vax “BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19.” Time to rethink all we were t…
RT @marybethpf: Remember when @NEJM said that Pfizer vax “BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19.” Time to rethink all we were t…
https://t.co/kNCR0t2OZO "Participants in the trial were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 30 μg of BNT162b2 (0.3 ml volume per dose) or saline placebo".
RT @marybethpf: Remember when @NEJM said that Pfizer vax “BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19.” Time to rethink all we were t…
Remember when @NEJM said that Pfizer vax “BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19.” Time to rethink all we were told, keeping in mind that @NEJM is top tier medical journal. https://t.co/rQOXvOxJBE
@delasttours @F_Alderweireld @Unreadu93 Non. Pfizer est le partenaire production et distribution. https://t.co/E6aU5So6Si
@Libtarded_com @SifuThorenki @tommysantos14 @GuntherEagleman You are unaware of the physical universe in which you reside. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@CharlieMieMie @Martin30371096 @sjustermleen @dannyvermeeren @MarionKoopmans Uhh.... OK, zoals je wil. Zitten slapen de afgelopen 3 jaar? Resultaten afgeronde testfase, gepubliceerd in december 2020: https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk
RT @TheVeto3: 1/10 Publication Pfizer de décembre 2020 dans le NEJM versus publications des données brutes de Pfizer #Pfizerdata https://t.…
RT @TheVeto3: 1/10 Publication Pfizer de décembre 2020 dans le NEJM versus publications des données brutes de Pfizer #Pfizerdata https://t.…
@NLamolinara @TheDrJon its the exact question doctors relied on. The evidence on rollout showed the vaccines were safe and effective https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
RT @thewhitewolf51: @HumaneScum @IanCopeland5 Here is one. But will you even read it? If you read it will you trust it? https://t.co/XVkI…
@MartinKlocke @mangatschinga @NiKanmuc @Factnerd104 @andi281270 @DrPuerner Guter Mann, ich habe die Zulassungsstudie schon im November 2020 beim NEJM https://t.co/p7cRckA1rC gelesen und mache seit Jahren med. Aufklärung Was wollen Sie denn jetzt?
@ChatSecouriste @MarieApprentie @Paracl2 @mourning_zo Pour l'étude il s'agit de l'étude de Pfizer! Ca fait 3 fois que je te le répète! Voici les lien: - Vidal résumant cette étude https://t.co/DTZosT7MAh - Etude de pfizer https://t.co/2HbaXDXOO3
@HumaneScum @IanCopeland5 Here is one. But will you even read it? If you read it will you trust it? https://t.co/XVkIQaGUmD