@Olivierfente @booba Tiens, une petite suite de tweets pour démonter tous leurs bobards à ces guignols des #nofakemerdes https://t.co/rLv1VR2231
@booba @Drmartyufml Tiens @Drmartyufml, Fig. 3, https://t.co/xDJLIHYHxu les courbes de survie, une personne dans le grp des vaccinés a fait une forme grave de la maladie, et oh surprise, page 11, https://t.co/SeEkPvpv2e cette personne semble être décédée d
@Hetismijmike @Vredenbergvindt @ChrisTCJansen @Wandelspel Stop met doen van uitspraken als je er niets van snapt. Nogmaals: je kijkt steeds naar de einddatum van een studie, waarvan de testfases al in november 2020 waren afgerond. Hier de testdata, kijk
@sudsy5830 @worstninjaever @crabb_vicki All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo
@DaveEvans5555 @judysimpson222 It wasn't untested, lyin' Dave. https://t.co/PA4PAp0h0w
@ronlocke88 Seems like you didn’t read it. I can provide you the link https://t.co/nllMjSWhu1
@DiedSuddenly_ @MrLJB2 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II & III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated con
@GagnerDeLaTune @Locuste_ @booba @raoult_didier >Expérimentale Quels seraient les tests supplémentaires que tu jugerais indispensables pour ne plus les considérer 'expérimentales' ?? >Pass 'Protéger tous, même les cons.' https://t.co/kecrbWP2HG
RT @lonnibesancon: Déjà, rappel, l'étude princeps de Pfizer ne testait pas ça en outcome primaire, et y'a rien de nouveau là dedans on le s…
@Korijen_roda @Alex_Marton https://t.co/N8hRg0gfJc Koji je ovo medij?
@JohnStone32 @lensiseethrough Yes. The mRNA platform allows for very rapid adaptations. Read this, and learn how a phase 3 human trial of a new vaccine works. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@MrBigSpit When you ignore the data that clearly debunks you, it doesn’t help you. It just makes you look worse. All you have demonstrated is a lack of critical thinking and unable to read and interpret scientific data. Admitting you are wrong provides a
@ivangrozni001 https://t.co/N8hRg0gfJc Ništa lakše seronjo. A sada posmatraj kako ces ovu studiju pobijati smisljanjem nove teorije zavere.
@HSmith24993512 @stkirsch Read the clinical trial report before believing what you read on line, you will be better informed. The phase 3 trials were randomized and placebo controlled (the R and C in RCT). https://t.co/Cvwo6qNoIo
@jhmdrei お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZ2uE
@tarutora17 @jhmdrei お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
@PaulKni01817402 @DrAseemMalhotra No (not sure which trials you are referring to) Here you go Pfizer; https://t.co/wh4c7o9aZg Moderna https://t.co/ZAxuraDXav AZ https://t.co/5ZbvSTBLnh
@_TwiztidMenace_ @art_burke @stkirsch Are you joking? Pfizer's original trial in 43,000 people (5%): https://t.co/RSyNxjPyR8 Moderna's original trial in 30,000 people (6%): https://t.co/K3EWYY4BU0 https://t.co/Xaj5ipOsh9
@_TwiztidMenace_ @art_burke @stkirsch Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found *95%* protection against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the New England Journal of
@gottaluvaboomer @Deborah02138923 @im_right_though @taradublinrocks @BlackKnight10k They "admitted" no such thing. Pfizer tested the efficacy of their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infec
@nofunin10ded @BlueSlots Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infection (i.e. illness), and published the results in the New England Journal of
@GeraldineHocki3 @AlBowers1 @_APWK_ @IanCopeland5 Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the New England J
@carolmswain Fauci is lying about how long the Covid-19 vaccine was studied for safety. Here is the actual Pfizer clinical trial that they did before releasing their vaccine. The study itself reports that the median length of followup for safety issues was
@Darkellysio @booba @Escale_SNCF @barriere_dr La preuve avec les conclusions des essais cliniques de Pfizer : https://t.co/xDJLIHYHxu Fig. 3, une personne dans le grp des vaccinés à fait une forme grave de la covid 19, dans le tableau correspondant,
@fugarus78 @ultimatejazzfan @1221IZZI @reactive_yuri @ukIemons @stkirsch December 2020 - "A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older." https://t.co/SS4JJp9o0j
@CryptoFLmoon @epigeneticallyj @LanaLuBerry @thevaccstat @LBower32390965 @KJW2022 @HeyNurseKat @gaudall @IanCopeland5 Now look carefully at the original studies that showed it was over 90% effective against the original Wuhan strain. Pfizer: https://t.co/z
@NicolasMouney74 @VLautard @barriere_dr Expérimental ? Quels seraient les tests supplémentaires que vous jugeriez indispensables pour ne plus le considérer experimental ??? https://t.co/kecrbWP2HG
@xxphdg @VLautard @barriere_dr Efficacité non prouvée ? Effets secondaires flous ??? https://t.co/kecrbWP2HG
@Scintigraphiste Renseigne toi. J'ai pas le temps. l'AMM c'etait pour 2 injections seulement : pas 3 ou 4, pas pour les enfants, ni les femmes enceintes. Et les resultats qui ont permis d'obtenir l'AMM concerne un produit différent de celui injecté https:/
@ShaIsGood @xja1993 @booba Et puis l'immunité acquise qui diminue avec le temps écoulé depuis l'injection est un phénomène connue c'est pas comme si les limitations des données de l'ECR dispo fin 2020 n'étaient pas précisées dans la publication.. https://
@exergraci0017 @lacorne2 Et pourtant elle est publiée https://t.co/OClC6yCxaV
@BobGratouille @juliettemorin45 On commence par la phase 3. https://t.co/OClC6yCxaV
@pojeo_goluba @IvkovichV https://t.co/N8hRg0gfJc. A možda zato sto je bezbedna i efikasna? Ali razumem vas. Ta priča o placenicima, klasicna autoprojekcija.
@r_hirschman The clinical trials (10 Dec 2020) showed vaccinated people got infected: "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to pl
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
@Nanardion @TT4thewin @regismaag @LuisCamps5 @raoult_didier Non, j'ai lu les études. Ca aide. https://t.co/MVYO3V52dN https://t.co/mAfUmB8Cnv
@IvkovichV @PakoDzabana Pa recimo od cinjenice da je sprovedena faza ispitivanja bezbednoati i efikasnosti, radjena na preko 43 000 ispitanika. https://t.co/N8hRg0gfJc.
@PolFabrice @barriere_dr @booba https://t.co/kPgW9tWS9L Et https://t.co/5xwoWdW2LM Vive pubmed !
@bljuc_k @Dragana0103 @milanovicnenad3 https://t.co/N8hRg0gfJc "Nisu prosle klinička ispitivanja" propo...
@VigilantFox @P_McCulloughMD Well, I guess Dr. McCullough needs to surrender his medical license until he completes CME, because Fauci committed neither fraud nor negligent homicide. And backing up your lies with more lies won’t make them true. On the oth
Here's a link to the article on the NEJM web site. https://t.co/jVkjnBNlxf
@monkey449 @ovierocks1 @IanCopeland5 @Jayde8700 @HerbsandDirt No one claimed 100%, that is a lie. Can you point to your criticism of the following, commenting on both methodology robustness & statistical power of the data? https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@diseasy_e @VaxxersAnti And the Covid vaccine had a clinical trial. It was a short one, but it DID have one & the initial trials ARE a clinical trial. :) And Vaccines CAN be pushed out to the public when the initial trials prove there is not a proble
@PhilipS05519058 @kylenabecker @TheChiefNerd @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/GVFCFzjv5g Here's the article. Worthy to note that all deaths were accounted for and NONE of them were from COVID which kinda defeats RFKs whole point.
@G01X1 @sousyou13 そこまでする看護学生がいないと見込んでのパワハラでしょ。 まず、注射方式の新型コロナワクチン接種には高い発症防止効果があるものの感染防止効果が無いので感染しても症状が出にくいので院内感染防止には逆効果だと説得すべき。 https://t.co/SQPHaUTGmf また、検査にも応じると宣言すべき。→
@itsmeitsstillme @2Swerdy @ukIemons Why do you make up nonsense when you have literally zero understanding of a topic? Do you troll physics sites and tell those "idiots" how to really smash those particles together? The internet is a terrible thing for you
@cmkiel @ErinArdell @annmforti @DrNice2022 @JohnBeaudoinSr Here are the double blind placebo controlled studies. I am curious on why people are so confident in things that can be easily debunked in less than 5 seconds. https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E https://t.c
@mirervardi @BarryYoungNZ @winstonpeters @nzfirst @NZNationalParty @nzlabour The clinical trials published Dec 2020 clearly showed vaccinated people being infected. ANYONE saying that the vaccine stopped all transmission got it wrong. ANYONE!! https://t
@Ant_Mazz Are you saying 0.5 ml saline placebo caused 17 deaths? The difference is not significant for the deaths. There were 10 cases of severe disease in the unvaccinated and 1 case in the vaccinated. It was significant. https://t.co/SynKdfAUDl htt
@JeremyFoub @pia_mapia @lonnibesancon @Beatrice_Rosen @MamansLouves C'est littéralement le but premier de l'essai clinique de phase 2 et 3. Contrôler la sécurité (et l'efficacité). C'est même le titre de l'étude. Mais tu as raison, personne ne s'est occupé
@Scotty_2017 @monkey449 @IanCopeland5 @Jayde8700 @HerbsandDirt How is this hiding things? https://t.co/yyE3HoXzrI https://t.co/AJeLbl5RYS
Self-own COVID shares paper that proves mRNA has no survival advantage due to cardiac deaths... ...then brags about giving it to children https://t.co/z0DHOikgxj
@DFla56 @mtkwatters1 @monkey449 @IanCopeland5 @Jayde8700 @HerbsandDirt I see why you haven’t posted the link. You guys never do. 44k tested. Shows it’s safe and effective. You have to mislead to try and con people. It’s very sad. https://t.co/XpP4nlv
@_InThisTogether Phase 3 trial completed, published Dec. 2020 . https://t.co/zXpsYh4Kbf
@KMAnder777 @TorySnyc @dogmomjenn @MdBreathe How about you don’t parrot anti-vac lies. https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E https://t.co/QnzPytkzdv https://t.co/30aahPVG5k
@DavidBCollum Here is the summary. Importantly, note the extended efficacy data in the graph. https://t.co/ZKFX6ZXbws
@TheChiefNerd Thanks for posting this. Would encourage all curious to read the original paper published on NEJM and interpret for yourselves if RFK is lying. Don’t blindly believe anything that is told to you. Link👇 https://t.co/ZpTUbyBeEY
Et pour l'efficacité sur la transmission c'est ici: https://t.co/8dItkt321q
RT @Masanori_Asami: @fgidf98fj9jh0h mRNA新型コロナワクチンの問題点について、 (1)新型コロナワクチン全般の問題: 抗原原罪、変異による免疫逃避、ADEの潜在的危険 (2)根付き候補を選んだ候補選定ミス (3)mRNAに由来する問題…
@TheChiefNerd Two BNT162b2 recipients died (one from arteriosclerosis, one from cardiac arrest), as did four placebo recipients (two from unknown causes, one from hemorrhagic stroke, and one from myocardial infarction). https://t.co/KEqMPm5nzc
RT @dr_jon_l: Dec 31/20 the Pfizer Randomized trial is published in NEJM. The Visual abstract states under "Limitations and Further Questi…
@DoctorZywiecMD @MdBreathe @IanCopeland5 @TheChiefNerd For Pfizer: Preclinical https://t.co/kFKyeLPWNX Phase 1/2 https://t.co/bPGI2A70Ps Phase 3 https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E Moderna: Preclinical https://t.co/dsujyosI2O Phase 1 https://t.co/jwGWmeT130 Phase 2
RT @dr_jon_l: Dec 31/20 the Pfizer Randomized trial is published in NEJM. The Visual abstract states under "Limitations and Further Questi…
@ifbacongrewont1 @sjs856 False. Here are clinical trials which were undertaken prior to general public release, first published 10 Dec 2020. All pharmaceuticals must have clinical trials prior to rollout. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-1
@BestOfMyWeb @EricBillyFR @santegouv_sn @justice_gouv @gouvernementFR Décembre 2020, bonne lecture et bienvenue dans le monde réel : https://t.co/5tHXFbDXEG
@Lewis62549879 @PNdm7pCm7E3whGI @BohemianAtmosp1 Start here. Just the first randomized two trials with >70,000 people. There are dozens and dozens more. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@thevivafrei “Never intended to prevent infection” is also a lie Behold Dec 31 2020. NEJM. Primary end point = “cases” https://t.co/vfOReydhqz
@SocialMothMan22 @BerryTartlet @0minus_Prime Sure...scroll down to adverse events....it states that safety concerns will be monitored for 2 years....where is that report and why is there no data on Myocarditis/Pericarditis in this study?? Means no person
@Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8 ただのしがない新人ですよ😥 で、そのBMJで元社員が告発した所でしっかりと有効性を導き出した論文が出てますよね。 その一例としてマルスさんが勘違いしたこの論文ですね。 今の所は有効性がデメリットを上回ってる様ですね。 https://t.co/gMiNKbOci2
@Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8 いや、BMJの話は研究じゃ無くて臨床試験の話ですよね?? この論文関係無いですよね? https://t.co/gMiNKbOci2 そもそも臨床試験を論文にするなんて聞いた事無いなとは思ったんですよ。
@TJ40in1975 @zap_lock @nob0dyhome2022 Why is he a liar? He told you the evidence is in his timeline, here is some more right here since google seems to be beyond you! 🤷♂️ https://t.co/Ftf7MxJojP
@Censored4sure @JohntheLyricist Luther we all know you don’t know how to evaluate safety data, therefore you aren’t entitled to an opinion on it. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@RDVSVNZLA Como no te gustan los de fase IV puedes ver los de fase III. De los primeros en 2020. https://t.co/fKJzZQ9UGS
@DMTLIFE @bstrat515 @InternetH0F You are misinformed or lying. Phase III studies: https://t.co/VRp3LIqv6e (45,000 + participants) https://t.co/D1XgDTRvq8 (30,000 + participants Phase I/II studies: https://t.co/NBoD7HWuPa https://t.co/VMsXoz6lwq Phase II st
@ColleenAckert @zap_lock @TheEMC12 Here's Pfizer's Phase 3 clinical trial conducted on 43,548 humans: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@rvandenhaak @Joeli_77 @vdvehi @ToKnowOrNot @StassenFrank @TheDark23538833 @dancalegria @Marc_Veld Je liegt dus wel... dat is info dat je maar 1x hoeft op te zoeken en niet meer vergeet. En het onderzoek.... https://t.co/b3waltAKQM(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dos
@ColleenAckert @zap_lock @TheEMC12 Scotch mist ? https://t.co/m0u2mPEacL
@RebeccaUdon @MartinAntkowiak @AnnadeBuisseret @ChrisWickNews Are you seriously out of your tiny mind?There are hundreds more. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@Herd851 @CaulfieldTim @GordPennycook @MSNBC Since those of us who have scientific literacy don’t share your doubts, you need to specifically address your criticisms. Include in your answer a discussion on the robustness of the methodology and the statisti
@dam_gev55215 @ninogmoney @mano_taki @MathieuMolimard @Inserm @sretailleau @raoult_didier Relis mon tweet. Et l'étude de Pfizer est accessible à tous depuis 4 ans. https://t.co/5tHXFbDXEG
@dam_gev55215 @ninogmoney @mano_taki @MathieuMolimard @Inserm @sretailleau @raoult_didier Tout le monde l'a depuis 2020 t'es vraiment allumé toi... https://t.co/5tHXFbDXEG
@AlmadeJazmn1 @lotrafrida @la99delsub La de múltiples estudios multicéntricos, randomizados, doble-ciego con n>20,000 y confianza >95% como se hace la ciencia (le dejo un ejemplo) aprobadas por FDA, EMA y países con alta vigilancia sanitaria. Si ente
@ValZimmer2 @Cox_A_R The Covid jabs went through proper trials. If you have evidence to the contrary, please post it. https://t.co/Z1ezYLBZWR
@IrnBoru @john_grono @MurfittTauranga here is the trial. show me where they tested infection? https://t.co/zXpsYh4Kbf