You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
miRNAs regulate stem cell self-renewal and differentiation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2012.00191 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zuoren Yu, Yuan Li, Huimin Fan, Zhongmin Liu, Richard G. Pestell |
Abstract |
Stem cells undergo symmetric and asymmetric divisions to generate differentiated cells and more stem cells. The balance between self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells is controlled by transcription factors, epigenetic regulatory networks, and microRNAs (miRNAs). Herein the miRNA involvement in the regulation of stem cell self-renewal and differentiation is summarized. miRNA contribution to malignancy through regulating cancer stem cells is described. In addition, the reciprocal associations between miRNAs and epigenetic modifications in control of stem cell fate are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 36% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,734,103
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,430
of 11,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,242
of 244,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#133
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.