The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Electromagnetic field stimulation for treating delayed union or non‐union of long bone fractures in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008471.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xavier L Griffin, Matthew L Costa, Nick Parsons, Nick Smith |
Abstract |
Delayed union and non-union of fractures are a considerable cause of morbidity to patients. Laboratory studies have shown that electromagnetic fields can stimulate the formation of new bone, indicating a potential role for electromagnetic stimulation in the treatment of fractures that have failed to heal. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 40% |
Grenada | 1 | 20% |
Andorra | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 215 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
Researcher | 21 | 10% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Other | 54 | 25% |
Unknown | 48 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
Engineering | 11 | 5% |
Psychology | 8 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 28 | 13% |
Unknown | 58 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,647,099
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,524
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,695
of 120,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.