↓ Skip to main content

Fast-Track Ultrasound Clinic for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis Changes the Prognosis of the Disease but Not the Risk of Future Relapse

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast-Track Ultrasound Clinic for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis Changes the Prognosis of the Disease but Not the Risk of Future Relapse
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2020.589794
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Monti, Alice Bartoletti, Elisa Bellis, Paolo Delvino, Carlomaurizio Montecucco

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,576,445
of 23,271,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,535
of 5,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,325
of 508,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#88
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.