The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Racial Disparities in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of the Role of Biologic and Non-biologic Factors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.576964 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Om Prakash, Fokhrul Hossain, Denise Danos, Adam Lassak, Richard Scribner, Lucio Miele |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 65 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 74 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,063,177
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#449
of 10,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,634
of 504,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#32
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.