The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trajetórias da desigualdade: como o Brasil mudou nos últimos 50 anos, de Marta Arretche
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.17666/3190175-177/2016 |
Authors |
Marcelo Medeiros |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
Philosophy | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#23,862,045
of 26,559,802 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais
#300
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,358
of 403,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.