The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association of nutrient-derived dietary patterns with sarcopenia and its components in community-dwelling older Japanese: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00665-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuri Yokoyama, Akihiko Kitamura, Satoshi Seino, Hunkyung Kim, Shuichi Obuchi, Hisashi Kawai, Hirohiko Hirano, Yutaka Watanabe, Keiko Motokawa, Miki Narita, Shoji Shinkai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Belgium | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Unspecified | 9 | 10% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Unspecified | 9 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,433,720
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#552
of 1,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,177
of 539,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 539,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.