The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
1,1-Difluoro-1-alkenes as new electrolyte additives for lithium ion batteries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Power Sources, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.139 |
Authors |
Tadahiko Kubota, Masayuki Ihara, Shinichi Katayama, Hideki Nakai, Junji Ichikawa |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 45% |
Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 16 | 42% |
Energy | 6 | 16% |
Materials Science | 6 | 16% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#1,084
of 9,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,072
of 179,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#17
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,670 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.