You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coexisting With Different Human-Wildlife Coexistence Perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.703174 |
| Authors |
Jenny Anne Glikman, Beatrice Frank, Kirstie A. Ruppert, Jillian Knox, Carly C. Sponarski, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf, Alexander L. Metcalf, Silvio Marchini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 50% |
| Scientists | 16 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,694,952
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#67
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,949
of 438,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#14
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.