The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender bias and inequity holds women back in their conservation careers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1056751 |
| Authors |
Robyn James, Jonathan R. B. Fisher, Chelsea Carlos-Grotjahn, Marissa S. Boylan, Baigalmaa Dembereldash, Meaza Z. Demissie, Crystal Diaz De Villegas, Bridget Gibbs, Ruth Konia, Kristen Lyons, Hugh Possingham, Cathy J. Robinson, Tiantian Tang, Nathalie Butt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 56 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 58% |
| Scientists | 27 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#608,832
of 26,510,696 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#56
of 4,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,958
of 491,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#6
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,510,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.