↓ Skip to main content

REDD+ in Theory and Practice: How Lessons From Local Projects Can Inform Jurisdictional Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REDD+ in Theory and Practice: How Lessons From Local Projects Can Inform Jurisdictional Approaches
Published in
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00011
Authors

Sven Wunder, Amy E. Duchelle, Claudio de Sassi, Erin O. Sills, Gabriela Simonet, William D. Sunderlin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Unspecified 10 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 51 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 39 26%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Unspecified 11 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 58 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,015,913
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,634
of 387,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them