↓ Skip to main content

Chromatin loops, gene positioning, and gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chromatin loops, gene positioning, and gene expression
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sjoerd Holwerda, Wouter de Laat

Abstract

Technological developments and intense research over the last years have led to a better understanding of the 3D structure of the genome and its influence on genome function inside the cell nucleus. We will summarize topological studies performed on four model gene loci: the α- and β-globin gene loci, the antigen receptor loci, the imprinted H19-Igf2 locus and the Hox gene clusters. Collectively, these studies show that regulatory DNA sequences physically contact genes to control their transcription. Proteins set up the 3D configuration of the genome and we will discuss the roles of the key structural organizers CTCF and cohesin, the nuclear lamina and the transcription machinery. Finally, genes adopt non-random positions in the nuclear interior. We will review studies on gene positioning and propose that cell-specific genome conformations can juxtapose a regulatory sequence on one chromosome to a responsive gene on another chromosome to cause altered gene expression in subpopulations of cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 227 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 30%
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 30 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 27%
Computer Science 8 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 34 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,735,403
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,432
of 11,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,241
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#133
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.